The bearing capacity of soils is one of the most fundamental concepts in geotechnical and foundation engineering. It defines the ability of soil to support the loads applied by structures without undergoing shear failure or excessive settlement. The stability and longevity of any building, bridge, dam, or other civil engineering structure depend largely on the accurate estimation of soil bearing capacity. An inadequate foundation design resulting from poor assessment of bearing capacity can lead to severe structural damage, costly repairs, or even catastrophic failure.
This article provides an extensive exploration of the concept of soil bearing capacity, including its theoretical background, influencing factors, methods of determination, and practical implications in engineering design.
1. Introduction to Bearing Capacity
In civil engineering, the bearing capacity of soil refers to the maximum pressure that the ground can safely withstand from the foundation of a structure without undergoing shear failure or excessive settlement. When a load is applied to the soil through a foundation, the stress distribution within the soil mass changes. If this stress exceeds the strength of the soil, failure occurs either through shear deformation or by excessive settlement, both of which compromise structural integrity.
Therefore, understanding and evaluating the bearing capacity is essential for designing safe, economical, and durable foundations.
Basic Definition
The bearing capacity can be expressed as:
q = Q / A
Where:
- q = bearing pressure or bearing capacity (kN/m²)
- Q = load applied to the foundation (kN)
- A = area of the foundation (m²)
When the applied stress (q) is less than or equal to the safe bearing capacity of the soil, the foundation remains stable. If it exceeds this value, the soil may fail.
2. Types of Bearing Capacity
The bearing capacity of soil is categorized into three main types based on the stage of failure and design considerations.
2.1 Ultimate Bearing Capacity (qult)
The ultimate bearing capacity is the maximum pressure the soil can support before it undergoes complete shear failure. At this stage, large deformations occur, and the soil mass beneath and around the foundation fails.
2.2 Net Ultimate Bearing Capacity (qnu)
This is the ultimate bearing capacity minus the overburden pressure at the foundation level. It represents the net increase in pressure the soil can bear due to the foundation load.
qnu = qult – γDf
Where:
- γ = unit weight of soil
- Df = depth of foundation
2.3 Safe Bearing Capacity (qsafe)
The safe bearing capacity is obtained by dividing the ultimate bearing capacity by a factor of safety (FOS), generally ranging between 2.5 and 3.0, depending on the nature of the structure and soil type.
qsafe = qult / FOS
This ensures that the structure will remain stable even under unforeseen conditions or uncertainties in soil properties.
2.4 Allowable Bearing Pressure (qa)
This is the maximum contact pressure that should not produce settlement exceeding the permissible limits of the structure. It takes both shear failure and settlement into account.
3. Modes of Soil Failure
When the bearing capacity of soil is exceeded, the ground may fail in several ways depending on the type of soil, foundation shape, and loading conditions.
3.1 General Shear Failure
- Occurs in dense sand or stiff clay.
- A well-defined failure surface forms, extending from the edges of the foundation to the ground surface.
- Sudden failure occurs with a noticeable bulging of soil.
- It is characterized by a distinct peak load followed by a drop in load-carrying capacity.
3.2 Local Shear Failure
- Occurs in medium dense sands or medium clays.
- Failure surfaces are not fully developed.
- Partial bulging occurs, and failure is progressive rather than sudden.
- Load-settlement curve shows gradual increase without a sharp peak.
3.3 Punching Shear Failure
- Common in loose sand or soft clay.
- The foundation penetrates the soil without significant lateral displacement.
- No distinct failure surface forms.
- Settlement occurs progressively without visible warning signs.
4. Theoretical Approaches to Bearing Capacity
The theoretical evaluation of bearing capacity is based on the principles of soil mechanics and shear strength theory. The earliest and most influential contributions came from Karl Terzaghi, who developed the classical bearing capacity equation.
4.1 Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory
Terzaghi’s formula for a strip footing on homogeneous soil is expressed as:
qult = cNc + γDfNq + 0.5γBNγ
Where:
- c = cohesion of soil
- γ = unit weight of soil
- Df = depth of foundation
- B = width of foundation
- Nc, Nq, Nγ = bearing capacity factors dependent on the angle of internal friction (φ)
The values of Nc, Nq, and Nγ are determined empirically or from charts.
This formula assumes that the failure surface beneath the foundation is a combination of three zones:
- Elastic equilibrium under the foundation base
- Radial shear zone
- Rankine passive zone
4.2 Meyerhof’s General Bearing Capacity Equation
Meyerhof (1951) modified Terzaghi’s theory to include the effects of the shape and inclination of the foundation load. His equation is:
qult = cNcscdcic + qNqsqdqiq + 0.5γBNγsγdγiγ
Where:
- s, d, and i represent shape, depth, and load inclination factors, respectively.
- q = γDf
Meyerhof’s approach is more general and applicable to different foundation shapes such as square, circular, and rectangular footings.
4.3 Hansen’s and Vesic’s Theories
Later researchers such as Hansen (1970) and Vesic (1973) further refined the theory by introducing correction factors for eccentric loading, base inclination, and ground inclination. These methods are widely used in modern design codes and geotechnical analysis software.
5. Factors Affecting Bearing Capacity
Several factors influence the bearing capacity of soils. Understanding these parameters is crucial for accurate assessment and design.
- Soil Type: Cohesive soils (clays) and cohesionless soils (sands, gravels) behave differently under load.
- Moisture Content: Increased water content reduces effective stress and shear strength.
- Density of Soil: Denser soils provide higher resistance to deformation and greater bearing capacity.
- Depth of Foundation: Deeper foundations generally have higher bearing capacity due to confinement and increased overburden pressure.
- Width of Foundation: Wider footings distribute loads more effectively, increasing capacity up to a certain limit.
- Shape of Foundation: Circular and square footings typically have higher bearing capacity compared to strip footings.
- Inclination of Load: Eccentric or inclined loads reduce effective bearing area and capacity.
- Groundwater Level: High groundwater reduces effective stress and leads to lower capacity.
- Soil Layering: Weak layers beneath strong ones can lead to failure despite high surface strength.
- Seismic Effects: Earthquake-induced stresses can cause liquefaction and drastic reduction in bearing capacity.
6. Methods of Determining Bearing Capacity
The bearing capacity can be determined using three main approaches: theoretical, empirical, and experimental methods.
6.1 Theoretical Methods
These are based on analytical formulas such as Terzaghi’s or Meyerhof’s equations. They require knowledge of soil parameters like cohesion, friction angle, and unit weight obtained from laboratory or field tests.
6.2 Empirical Methods
Empirical correlations are developed from field test data. Commonly used empirical relations include:
- Standard Penetration Test (SPT): The number of blows (N-value) is correlated to bearing capacity.
- Cone Penetration Test (CPT): Cone resistance (qc) provides a direct indication of soil strength.
- Plate Load Test: A direct field test measuring load-settlement behavior to estimate safe bearing pressure.
6.3 Experimental and Numerical Methods
Modern geotechnical engineers increasingly use numerical simulations such as finite element analysis (FEA) and limit equilibrium methods to model complex soil-structure interactions. These techniques allow more accurate assessment under varying conditions.
7. Field Tests for Bearing Capacity
7.1 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
The SPT is widely used for determining soil strength. A split-barrel sampler is driven into the ground, and the number of blows required for a certain penetration is recorded. The N-value obtained is then correlated with bearing capacity.
7.2 Cone Penetration Test (CPT)
The CPT involves pushing a cone-tipped probe into the soil at a constant rate while recording the resistance to penetration. It provides continuous data on soil stratigraphy and bearing capacity.
7.3 Plate Load Test
A circular or square steel plate is placed at the foundation level and loaded incrementally until failure or significant settlement occurs. The resulting load-settlement curve is used to calculate the ultimate and safe bearing capacities.
7.4 Pressuremeter Test
This test measures soil deformation in-situ by expanding a cylindrical probe within a borehole. It provides direct values of in-situ stress-strain behavior, useful for foundation design.
8. Settlement and Bearing Capacity
While the ultimate bearing capacity prevents shear failure, the allowable bearing pressure ensures that settlement remains within permissible limits. There are two types of settlement:
- Immediate Settlement: Elastic deformation occurring soon after loading, typical in sandy soils.
- Consolidation Settlement: Time-dependent settlement due to expulsion of water in cohesive soils.
Both must be evaluated in conjunction with bearing capacity to prevent serviceability problems such as cracks or differential movement.
9. Improvement of Bearing Capacity
In cases where soil bearing capacity is insufficient, several ground improvement methods can be adopted:
- Compaction: Increases density and strength of granular soils.
- Drainage and Dewatering: Reduces pore pressure and increases effective stress.
- Soil Stabilization: Addition of lime, cement, or fly ash to enhance strength.
- Grouting: Injecting cementitious materials into voids to increase stiffness.
- Use of Deep Foundations: Piles and caissons transfer loads to deeper, stronger strata.
- Reinforcement with Geosynthetics: Geogrids and geotextiles provide tensile strength and confinement.
10. Bearing Capacity of Different Soil Types
10.1 Cohesive Soils (Clays)
Bearing capacity primarily depends on cohesion (c) and is less affected by depth. For purely cohesive soils (φ = 0), Terzaghi’s equation simplifies to:
qult = 5.7c + γDf
Soft clays have low capacity and often require deep foundations or ground improvement.
10.2 Cohesionless Soils (Sands and Gravels)
In sandy soils, bearing capacity depends largely on the angle of internal friction (φ) and density. The general shear failure mechanism is typical, and capacity increases significantly with depth and width of foundation.
10.3 Layered Soils
In reality, soil strata are rarely homogeneous. Engineers must evaluate each layer’s strength and thickness to determine the composite bearing capacity, using weighted averages or more advanced numerical models.
11. Bearing Capacity under Eccentric and Inclined Loads
When the load is not applied vertically or is eccentric, the effective bearing area decreases. The resulting non-uniform stress distribution can cause tilting or sliding.
Correction Factors:
- Eccentricity factor: Reduces effective width of footing as B’ = B – 2e, where e is eccentricity.
- Inclination factor: Reduces bearing capacity by considering horizontal load components.
Modern design codes, including Eurocode 7 and IS 6403, provide equations to adjust bearing capacity for such loading conditions.
12. Bearing Capacity in Special Conditions
12.1 Sloping Ground
The inclination of the ground surface affects the passive resistance and failure mechanism. Reduction factors are applied depending on slope angle.
12.2 Seismic Conditions
During earthquakes, soil loses strength due to dynamic loading. The design must account for reduced effective stress and potential liquefaction.
12.3 Submerged or Saturated Soils
In waterlogged areas, the effective stress reduces due to buoyancy, lowering the bearing capacity drastically.
13. Numerical Modeling and Modern Analysis
With advancements in computational geotechnics, methods like finite element analysis (FEA), boundary element methods (BEM), and finite difference methods (FDM) are used to simulate real ground conditions and complex geometries. These tools provide more reliable predictions compared to traditional analytical methods, especially for non-homogeneous and anisotropic soils.
14. Design Codes and Standards
Various national and international standards guide bearing capacity assessment and foundation design. Some key codes include:
- IS 6403: Code of practice for determination of bearing capacity of shallow foundations.
- IS 1888: Standard for plate load test.
- BS 8004: British Standard for foundations.
- Eurocode 7 (EN 1997-1): Geotechnical design principles.
- ACI 336.2R: U.S. code for foundation design.
Leave a Reply